Joe Smith asked:

& lt; br/& gt; & lt; br/& gt; In the Königreich of the Nod, a villager the fate hängt in the Schwebe, like ways drà ¼ cken around the Orakel. Oracle its fate will decide. The sanctions können heavy demanded: Freedom or farmhand shank, the loss its worldly possession, the payment of punitive tariffs, or a prohibition against the journey. But Oracle is to be seen, and known all, which recognize in the situation well, debt or innocence from only one course of the villagers the breath. & quot; auà Ÿ erordentliche powers denial their insignificant visage. Dark, place and is mysterious, its internal function mode unknown was all with exception the assistant that him the Königreich. Assistant Seeim Eye promised that the Orakel uses mächtige magic unequalled in the world. It was, on the basis of these à „ uà Ÿ erungen that the König ordered the Orakel and its error free discussion absolutely. & lt; br/& gt; & lt; br/& gt; There a keyword, the villagers Puffs on the Orakel. Light dance on the front and their magic is to be seen clear. In moments, its mysterious evaluation at the conclusion, and his decision on one navigate you to pointing on its periphery. & quot; Schuldig.& quot; No further questions mà ¼ ssen to be placed, than the villagers are accompanied from room to expect its condemnation. & lt; br/& gt; & lt; br/& gt; The juridical system in the Königreich Nod sounds not true rather terribly? It may seem, how a fantasievolle history, which described above, functions exactly like our own juridical system it in the treatment of DWI/DUI Fällen. The Fälle, often abhängig of our own modern & quot; Oracle& quot; , the Intoxilyzer 5000. The Intoxilyzer 5000 is of its own assistants, the company CMI, Inc. The manufacturers promise that the machine is indeed, exactly. It is on the basis of this evaluation the fact that the states a law or an jurisdiction had definition firmly that is to be accepted the results of the intoxilyzer 5000, exactly. In Wisconsin the Intoxilyzer 5000 is a certified procedure fà ¼ r the Prà ¼ fung gemäà Ÿ § 343.305 (6) (B), statistics. And Wis Adm code § of Trans 311.04, and it is gewährt usually the assumption of the correctness and Zuverlässigkeit, sees v. Disch, 119 Wis.2d 461, 475, 351 NW2d 492, 499 (1984); State of v. shrubs, 217 Wis.2d 429, 442-43, 576 NW2d 904, 909 (1998), in Minnesota, 5000 is more intoxilyzer assumed zuverlässig, if ordnungsgemäà Ÿ the e became procedure into the Prà ¼ fung. State of v. Dille, 258 NW2d 565, 567 (Minn 1977) (quotations omitted) see Tate v. Comm& #39; r the pub. Security, 356 N.W.2d 766, 767-68 (Minn App. 1984). This is to be essentially proven to shifts of the burden of proof in a DWI/a DUI case by the state to the driver that the Intoxilyzer 5000 is mistaken. It is for this reason that many states, the current DWI/DUI law cases in connection with the SOURCE code of the Intoxilyzer 5000. & lt; br/& gt; & lt; br/& gt; Before the SOURCE code, a short and simplifying Erklärung can be discussed & quot; Oracle & quot; – the Intoxilyzer 5000 – is necessary. The Intoxilyzer 5000 is a machine with a complex sentence of functions. It is ¼ more ber a pipe fastened to an end fà ¼ r the receipt of breath Samples and a printer final a EDP system, the à to the other end with a record result. The driver breathes into the pipe, whirls around the sample in a chamber, in the box, and the printer shows then the test results. Probably, which happened that the machine à bernimmt ¼ a sample air from Benutzer-und Chambers of Commerce that air. Then infrared light radiates the absorption of certain waves by the enterprise chambers, where sensors on the other side of the chamber determine, like much from infra-red light arose. On the basis of these data, an analysis, in order to determine, the Höhe of the alcohol to take in the sample that the quantity of the light. Further mathematical computations become the determination of the Höhe the alcohol in the which is the basis fabric in the lung regarding the determination of the Höhe of the consumption of alcohol in alveolaren air. & lt; br/& gt; & lt; br/& gt; & quot; SOURCE code, a computer programme, is coded a sentence of instructions that control each mechanical function of the intoxilyzer 5000. This is valid unabhängig of it whether it itself around an instruction, around which machine up, which Là operate ¼ more fter, absorbs, or around analytic like the rate, with that alcohol infra-red light and the mathematical formula comparison alcohol content into alveoläre (& quot; deep Lunge& quot;) Air of the blood alcohol concentration in the fabric out. This entails, in order to understand, with the internal function mode of the Intoxilyzer 5000, is necessary it, a copy of the source code and those has it unabhängig tested fà ¼ r the correctness. & lt; br/& gt; & lt; br/& gt; As direct consequence to force in many states, Minnesota contained, defense submitted Anträge, the disclosure of the source code fà ¼ r the Intoxilyzer 5000. The state does not have an access to the source code and those, if it is requested, from the manufacturer, CMI, then is said, it is a Geschäftsgeheimnis acts, and that they are not indicated. In other words, nobody weià Ÿ, which inside the machine with exception of those, itself (or in writing) the source code. But after the law all are into the juridical system are to be assumed the result is correct, and to one groà Ÿ EN degree, undisputed. In other words, the reaction of CMI is the à „ quivalent to say – & quot; Trust us, it funktioniert.& quot; Unfortunately, if & quot; Vertrauen& quot; in the debt or innocence of the Bà ¼ more rger, is not so easy. & lt; br/& gt; & lt; Br/& gt; That is in particular the case, if all owners of computer are weià Ÿ, machines to Ausfällen. The failure könnte to the fact lies that from wrong code, code beschädigt or even on human failure or human mischief. Briefly said, machines are not perfect and humans the program are not perfect. Which is ärgerlich is particularly that the Intoxilyzer 5000 becomes a microchip, which is probably very much less developed as the use of your computer at home. The Prà ¼ fung fà ¼ r a breath of the sample Intoxilyzer becomes of a Z80 microprocessor, uses an EPROM memory fà ¼ r the program and fà ¼ r all operators by instructions and interfaces. Simply said, that is not state of the art. The Z90 microprocessor before ursprà ¼ the nglichen IMB PC. Indeed, it became again into the day fà ¼ r the Atari video game Pong. You notice & quot; Pong& quot; , a play with the Komplexität of two paddles and electronic ball hà ¼ pfen between the two. (See to www (DOT) pchistory (DOT) org) & lt; br/& gt; & lt; br/& gt; The argument that a driver mà ¼ ssen entrance to the SOURCE code, against the results breath test seem to be over effective win steam. In Minnesota, the state is that the manufacturers because of the Intoxilyzer 5000, CMI, Inc., with the argument that on the basis their CMI contract with the state the actual Eigentà is ¼ more mer the source code in copyright matters geschà ¼ tzt. In the complaint CMI, the conditions of the Minnesota Avers that it Eigentà ¼ more mer copyrights to this immaterial source code and the requirements to possess among other things specific achievement of the contract and the right (and copy) a seizable version of the immaterial, mental property, which pays state in order given and. The question regarding the disclosure SOURCE code as part of the DWI/DUI in Minnesota goes being gehört to the State of highest Court of Justice in the thing against Underdahl and more später in this year into 2008. In the long run, which knows result, if these because of DWI of crimes in this condition with ammunition, around the results of the modern & quot; Oracle& quot; – intoxilyzer 5000. Until the thing is decided, movements, to force the disclosure of the source code or unterdrà ¼ cken the breath test result, still an important and economically a part of the DWI defense arsenal. Such Anträge should in each case. & lt; br/& gt; & lt; br/& gt;

Visit Las Vegas!